(The views in this post are mine alone and not those of the Council)
At a Purbeck District Council Policy Group meeting last night one of the agenda items related to giving the Council officers some direction on how to address problems with Council representation on the Board of Purbeck Housing Trust.
Recently the PHT Board voted in favour of renumeration for their Board members. The Local Government Act doesn’t allow for appointed Councillors to be renumerated for their work on any outside body, so our two Councillors have had to be resigned by the Council from the PHT Board. Furthermore, I understand that the decision to renumerate the Board members has also meant that at least one of the tenant board members has had to resign as the allowance interferred with their benefits package.
This means currently there is no Council representation on the PHT Board. To restore that link it would seem quite easy for PHT to amend its constitution to allow Council members to not be renumerated and therefore end the conflict with the Local Government Act, but apparently PHT are refusing to do this. The result is that the Council will probably have to settle for a compromise whereby it puts forward a number of potential candidates to fill the places (these may be Councillors, members of the public or even officers) who are then selected by the PHT Board.
PHT seem to be saying that they introduced the renumeration to attract more experienced and “useful” board members, but it seems outrageous that they should refuse the Council their places by not allowing non-renumeration. One has to question their motives or wonder if this is a way that PHT can lose the involvement of the Council.
I sit on a Board where members are renumerated but others aren’t so it is clearly a matter of principle and stuboness than regulation.